When Canadian policymakers announced they were ceasing RRB issuances late last year, market participants were surely baffled by the timing of the decision. The idea of having one less tool to hedge against price pressures—at a time of rampant inflation—incited a wave of pushback from investors, especially pension fund sponsors with indexed schemes.
The ramifications of Canada’s decision
While policymakers’ decision to stop issuing new RRBs in Canada was attributed to weak demand, pension fund sponsors and insurers are adamant about the role inflation-linked bonds play in helping them meet their long-term commitments. Future payments to pensioners and beneficiaries are in many ways dependent on indexing, and RRBs have long been the preferred instrument to ensure these liabilities are aligned with interest-rate and inflation changes.
The cessation of the RRB program comes at a moment in which inflation is still a major headwind for investors. Despite having a firmer grip on price pressures, it’s too early for Canadians to declare victory of any kind against inflation. Volatile Consumer Price Index (CPI) components such as food and energy could drive prices higher at any given moment. Add to this the potential of further geopolitical escalation in Eastern Europe, and the question marks surrounding Canada’s decision become even more apparent.
Still, decision makers at the government level insist they’ve done their due diligence. After conducting 25 meetings with market participants, “ promoting liquidity” and “consolidating funding within core sectors” were cited as the primary catalysts affecting their decision (although a redistribution of RRB issuance volume would have a limited impact on nominal bonds’ liquidity). Understandably, inflation-linked bonds have become a costly borrowing alternative for the federal government. Apart from the illiquidity premium demanded by market participants to invest in RRBs, hefty inflation adjustments have made it harder for policymakers to service RRB commitments amid the current inflationary backdrop—rendering this instrument much less affordable for the federal government compared with nominal financing alternatives.
The size of the RRB market in Canada
Since their inception in Canada nearly three decades ago, RRBs have become a viable inflation hedging tool for investors. Between 1998 and 2020, the RRB market has trended upward, peaking at CAD$93 billion (up from $10 billion), but given the increase in rates, the market value has dropped in the years preceding the Government of Canada announcement.
The RRB market has altered its course
Tracking the market value of RRBs over the last 25 years
Source: Bloomberg, as of April 28, 2023.
Regarding the dissemination of RRBs in Canada, annual issuances had been almost steady at $2.2 billion until it was reduced in 2020. But even if RRBs represent just a mere fraction of the Canadian government bond market, it doesn’t mean they aren’t relied on by an exclusive cohort of institutional investors.
Canada has scaled back on RRBs since 2019
Annual RRB issuances since 2014 (CAD, billions)
Source: Bloomberg, as of April 28, 2023.
This brings us to our next point: What does this mean for asset owners?Canada’s decision to abandon RRB issuance makes it the first nation in the G7 to take inflation-linked bonds off the table.
In comparison with other countries, the percentage of Canada’s local currency government debt that’s inflation linked (9%) is somewhat aligned with the United States (12%) but much less aligned with countries such as the United Kingdom (41%) and Sweden (46%). With no new issuances to offset maturing RRBs in the future, it’s just a matter of time before that position of 9% begins to fizzle out. While it will still be possible to trade RRBs in Canada, price discovery may become a challenge as dealers increasingly revert to acting as agents between market players (instead of providing liquidity from their balance sheets).
"Canada’s decision to abandon RRB issuance makes it the first nation in the G7 to take inflation-linked bonds off the table."
The cessation of the RRB program could therefore exacerbate an already illiquid market (RRB trading activity hasn’t exceeded 0.82% of overall federal bonds trading volume since 2018), putting upward pressure on liquidity premiums and acting as a major headwind for years to come; practical inflation hedging alternatives are therefore needed going forward. So what are the options investors can turn to?
If the goal is short-term inflation protection
Thankfully, U.S. CPI is “sufficiently” correlated with Canadian CPI (r=0.88), making U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) a viable substitute for inflation-focused investors.
Buying short-term TIPS and hedging back to local currency may be an option for investors looking for a low-risk, Canadian dollar-denominated inflation alternative to RRBs.
Short-term TIPS (0–5-year maturities) may track monthly and yearly U.S. (and by extension, Canadian) inflation more closely than their longer-term counterparts, making them a good fit for hedging inflation over shorter horizons, in our view. The main reason for this is their shorter duration, or lower interest-rate risk. Compared with the aggregate TIPS market (or even just their longer-term equivalents), shorter-term TIPS tend to be less prone to price volatility because their inflation-adjusted income payments tend to drive a more sizable portion of total return.
If the goal is long-term inflation protection
It goes without saying that transitory spikes in inflation could have a detrimental effect on the ability of an investor (such as a pension fund sponsor) to meet future liabilities. After all, higher short-term inflation expectations have an impact on the actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of future liabilities. In the case of a CPI-indexed pension plan, for instance, a short-term inflation rate of 7% would increase the liabilities of the plan by roughly 5% if a 2% inflation rate was assumed. Of course, this effect would be exacerbated by longer bouts of higher inflation. Under the assumption of a persistent inflationary backdrop, we would have to gauge the sensitivity of future liabilities to a change in inflation with a measure called liability inflation duration (LID).
We believe matching liability inflation duration with inflation-linked bonds is the optimal solution for hedging inflation over prolonged periods of time but, again, investors aiming to start an inflation hedge program now might need to look to U.S.-based alternatives and hedge back to local currency. Fortunately, with a correlation of 0.86, the long-term break-even inflation rate in the United States closely mirrors the long-term break-even inflation rate in Canada, again emphasizing the parallels between the two countries.
By combining a long position on TIPS with a short position on Treasuries and CAD/USD FX management, investors could lock in the prevailing U.S. long-term inflation expectations (or break-even inflation rate). Of course, it would be important to match the LID when implementing this trade, but what’s interesting is that this strategy would add synthetic exposure to inflation only and free up capital to invest in higher-yielding asset classes such as corporate bonds and equities.
A reminder of the inflation hedging potential of real assets
While there are plenty of reasons to consider investing in real assets, investors could also rely on the long-term inflation protection conferred by this asset class. In the context of real estate and infrastructure companies, pricing power, shorter and more adaptable leasing provisions, periodic resets, and even the regulatory environment could permit them to easily adjust their revenues to inflation. By allowing them to pass the burden of higher prices through their rents, utility rates, or tolls to their customers, these companies can provide a degree of protection that can be of particular benefit in a heightened inflationary environment; elsewhere, timberland, farmland, and commodities also possess viable inflation hedging attributes. For timberland, the fact that timber is a direct or indirect input—often used in the production of goods and services in a growing economy—makes it less likely to be affected by inflationary pressures. In a similar fashion, agricultural products are deemed to be a core component of the economy and the CPI (just as commodities such as crude oil and natural gas are directly linked).
Over the last two decades, real assets have offered good protection in times of high inflation, making them a great diversifier for traditional stocks and bonds and a potentially valuable alternative for investors.
Adapting to the new reality
Even if RRBs are narrowly held, they serve an important purpose for a select group of institutional investors (mainly pension fund sponsors). While inflation has come down, it’s still a disruptor, prompting the need for alternatives to offset this risk.
Choosing between the short- or long-term options proposed above is a trade-off and dependent on an investor’s objectives and expectations for future inflation. Is inflation transitory or a longer-term threat? In the short run, the alternatives proposed may help achieve an additional asset-only return to compensate for the temporary spike in inflation. Over longer horizons, real assets, or a strategy of matching liability inflation duration, could offer good protection.
Whatever the objective, there’s no set tool or strategy that will act as a perfect substitute for Canadian RRBs. Like any investment, market participants need to rely on diversification and weigh the pros and cons of all inflation hedging strategies at their disposal.
Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Diversification does not guarantee a profit nor protect against loss in any market. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.
The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.
This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.
Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Manulife Investment Management
Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than a century of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.
This material has not been reviewed by, is not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at manulifeim.com/institutional
Australia: : Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture (Australasia) Pty Ltd, Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. Mainland China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area: Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Investment Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Investment Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) South Korea: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority
United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (US) LLC and Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited.
Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.